Oil change: Marape to alter Papua New Guinea’s oil and gas legislation


Prime Minister James Marape has introduced changes to Papua New Guinea’s Oil and Gas Act, claiming it will benefit the country’s ‘national interest’. The changes may well represent a major shift in the way hydrocarbon projects are developed in the future.

Prime Minister James Marape. Credit: James Marape/Facebook

Tabling significant changes to the country’s oil and gas legislation in Parliament last week, Papua New Guinea’s Prime Minister James Marape said PNG’s oil and gas laws have been ‘crafted and applied to entice foreign capital and know-how’. As a consequence, he stated, the ‘National Interest’ has been subordinated to ‘Commercial Interest’ at great cost to the people of PNG.

‘Attracting foreign investors and capital is important, but this cannot remain unchecked forever,’ Marape said. He added that foreign investors are ‘not here to support our “National Interest” agenda unless it suits them or they are compelled by law or politics to do so. They are motivated by profit, not nation building.’

‘We need to dispel the myth that industry doesn’t put a lot of money into PNG government coffers.’

The new Oil and Gas (Amendment) Bill 2020, which seeks to amend PNG’s existing Oil and Gas Act 1998, appears to be an important change of direction. Marape said there must be a greater ‘share of revenue’ going to the government, arguing that PNG gets a lower level than comparable producing countries around the world.

‘This necessarily means taking control of exploration activities through to development. Unless positive changes are made without destroying the industry, PNG’s total share of project revenue will continue being lower than most Producing Countries.’

Returns and cash flow

Santos’ John Chambers.

Defining what is meant by ‘project revenue’ is key.

Story continues after advertisment...

John Chambers, General Manager of Santos, said in an online conference last week that there tends to be a confusion between ‘cash flow’ (the amount of money that flows through the company, which is typically similar to revenue or sales) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) – the profitability of a project over its lifetime.

‘Cash flow is a distraction, because people think that is what you are splitting. In fact, what you split is profit, not cash flow.’

Tax revenue

While the Prime Minister is arguing PNG should get more for its oil and gas projects, Chambers claims the amount of tax revenue that the resources sector provides is often underestimated. He also believes in this decade it will also rise significantly as the ExxonMobil-led PNG LNG project moves into a more mature phase.

‘In resource-rich countries … there is also a “multiplier effect”, whereby a resource projects stimulates three times the projects size in additional economic activity.’

‘What they don’t realise is quite how important the PNG resource industry is. We need to dispel the myth that industry doesn’t put a lot of money into PNG government coffers.’

In 2017, according to Chambers, the direct government take from the resources industry accounted for about 20 per cent of government revenue: K2.437 billion out of a total of K12.098 billion total tax revenue. This was made up of:

  • Corporate income tax (K116 million)
  • ITC projects (K372 million)
  • Salary and wage tax (K597 million)
  • Royalties and levies (K298 million)
  • Dividends (K281 million)
  • Kumul Petroleum Holding’s share of PNG LNG cash flows (K759 million)
  • Other (K14 million)

Chambers said the resources industry percentage of government revenue will increase to 25 per cent of the total between the years 2020 and 2024 and 32 per cent of the total from 2026 to 2029 – largely due to an increase in corporate tax payments on PNG LNG.

‘Just the primary government take will rise to about 30 per cent and there will be a multiplier on that,’ Chambers said. ‘The sector will be of growing importance.’


The main potential point of difference, he said, is companies’ desire to maximise their return on investment and the government’s desire to strengthen the economy of the nation.

Marape seems to agree. He says PNG’s national interest agenda was not being protected properly by some sections of the legislation, pointing to sections 54, 56, 57, 183, 184 and 185 in particular.

‘What is concerning is that those sections are more supportive and protective of the “commercial interests” of foreign investors,’ said Marape, noting that sections 183, 184 and 185 ‘place the State at a disadvantage when negotiating the Agreements.’

Assuming the proposed legislation is gazetted, a greater role for Kumul Petroleum Holdings, the State’s nominee for oil and gas projects, in developing future projects should be expected.


  1. Pearrick Neimani says

    Thumbs up for PM JM and his government for introducing the amendment. Can the same be extendeded to cover the Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry sectors. A lot of the foreign logging companies are ripping this country apart and making millions leaving the biodiversity of this great nation high and dry.

  2. Joe Nikints Strathern says

    To benefit entirely from that which is within the nation is the birthright of every citizen. The problem is that not every citizen is equipped to MANAGE it, thus we think that we need help from abroad to not only take what is ours but to manage the whole process. These sections of legislation were thought up by those who thought we could not possibly manage it ourselves and thus deserved less than what we should get. PNG should not look for shortcuts to wealth creation for its citizens, the focus should be on the development of the gifts, skills and minds. If we do this, as time goes on the nation will progressively become brighter, smarter and more talented. More money and more benefits does not necessarily equate to growth and prosperity. If we change the laws to get more money, we must also make changes in how we think to manage that money. The problem is twofold, one maybe that we are getting less benefit or money from what is ours but secondly which is more of a concern is that that we are not managing properly our share for the development of every citizen of this nation. This is a big challenge but start now, please don’t waste time.

    • Wesley Mangula says

      I totally agree with Joe, What’s the point of getting a larger portion if we don’t know how to manage the present portion in our Nation Building and Prosperity endeavors

  3. Pengs Mita says

    If other countries have done it to maximize from their resources than we can also do the same. Good job JM

  4. Robert Mambis says

    This is the way forward. Thank you PM for the overwhelming insights in this vital income generating sector of our nation. May the wisdom of Yahweh continue to sustain you on all fronts.

  5. Samuel lavutul says

    Thanks PM for the shift in the Oil and Gas Industry. At the Act should enable an increase in our bargaining power.

  6. Lucy Bossard says

    PNG’s natural endowments for so long have been raped by Foreign Investors under the pretends of Nation Building. It is about time to envisage protectionism on all our Endowments!

    • Brian Dyson says

      Many Foreign and Local Investors have a genuine desire to help PNG succeed, others see it as an opportunity to exploit anything and everything to their own advantage. Rampart corruption and lawlessness within PNG stymies growth and in turn increases the risk factor priced into doing business there. Perhaps closer attention to Christian values would result in a far better outcome in wealth creation and sharing.

  7. Wambal Jal says

    Thankyou very much Prime Minister JM. A Review of all resources, Minerals & Non-Minerals should be done and incorporated with the Foreign Investment Policy before 2022 National Elections!🔥🙏

Leave a Reply